Does the preponderance of one who preponderates prohibition mean that he has chosen prohibition but has not yet resolved the dispute?

"The preference between jurisprudential opinions is a relative matter; a single opinion might be preferred by one jurist and disfavored by another. And for whoever prefers prohibition in a matter, this means that he sees it as prohibited, whether it is a strong presumption or a certain belief. However, this does not conclusively resolve the disagreement for others."