How do scholars rely on the interpretation of Muqatil ibn Sulayman, taking into consideration the accusation of anthropomorphism against him?
Muqatil ibn Sulayman al-Balkhi was one of the great exegetes. Scholars differentiated between his narrations of , which are not accepted, and his exegesis, which was praised by several, including al-Shafi'i. Muqatil authored a complete commentary on the Quran, in which he focused on explaining the Quran by the Quran, mentioning the reasons for revelation (asbab al-nuzul), and clarifying ambiguous points. His exegesis is characterized by simplicity, ease, and a comprehensive grasp of the meanings of the verses, and it is considered unique in its field. Benefiting from Muqatil's exegesis is possible and attainable, and scholars continue to benefit from it, while pausing on attributing anthropomorphism (tashbih) to him due to its absence in his books.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/190638
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 190638
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy