How do scholars rely on the interpretation of Muqatil ibn Sulayman, taking into consideration the accusation of anthropomorphism against him?

Muqatil ibn Sulayman al-Balkhi was one of the great exegetes. Scholars differentiated between his narrations of hadith, which are not accepted, and his exegesis, which was praised by several, including al-Shafi'i. Muqatil authored a complete commentary on the Quran, in which he focused on explaining the Quran by the Quran, mentioning the reasons for revelation (asbab al-nuzul), and clarifying ambiguous points. His exegesis is characterized by simplicity, ease, and a comprehensive grasp of the meanings of the verses, and it is considered unique in its field. Benefiting from Muqatil's exegesis is possible and attainable, and scholars continue to benefit from it, while pausing on attributing anthropomorphism (tashbih) to him due to its absence in his books.