Back to search
The question

Is one who ate or drank forgetfully while fasting a supererogatory fast, based on an erroneous fatwa, considered to have broken his fast, or should he complete his fast?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The majority opinion is that whoever breaks their fast due to forgetfulness, whether during an obligatory or a supererogatory fast, should complete their fast, and there is no make-up required of them. There is another view which holds that such a person has broken their fast, and their argument is that abstaining from things that break the fast is a pillar of fasting, just like the pillars of prayer. If a fasting person seeks a from someone whose knowledge they trust and acts upon that fatwa, they are excused. One who intentionally breaks a supererogatory fast does not incur sin, because a person observing a voluntary fast is their own master.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
178515
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy