Back to search
The question

Was the convergence upon the Mahdi in the year 1240 AH, as mentioned in the narration, an independent judgment (ijtihad) by Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, or was it a confirmed report? And did other scholars differ with him on this matter by mentioning other years that have not yet arrived?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

It is part of the belief of Ahl al- that the emergence of the Mahdi is one of the signs of the Hour. He will rule for seven years, filling the earth with justice. Jesus will descend, kill the Dajjal, and pray behind the Mahdi. Everything mentioned about specifying the time of his emergence is incorrect, because it pertains to the unseen, and no specific timing has been authentically reported from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. Moreover, some of the narrations mentioned in this regard are inauthentic, such as what was stated by Ibn Hajar al-Haytami and Nu'aym ibn Hammad in "Al-Fitan"; this book is weak and cannot be used as proof.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
115062
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy