Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on removing some features of a picture, such as the eyes, nose, and mouth, or removing the entire head, to make permissible the wearing of a garment on which the picture is found? And what is the ruling on the existence of pictures of living beings in which the eyes, nose, or mouth do not appear? And what is the evidence for that?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The texts of Islamic law indicate the prohibition and impermissibility of pictures and statues, except for those whose features are effaced or whose heads are severed. The opinions of scholars have differed regarding the meaning of "patterns (ruqam) on a garment." Some said they are pictures of inanimate objects, while others said they are permissible absolutely, or forbidden absolutely, or permissible if they are treated with disrespect (mumtahanah) and impermissible if they are hung up. As for a picture whose head is cut off, or whose features are effaced, or whose parts are separated, it is not considered a picture by agreement, and there is no harm in its remaining if it is treated with disrespect.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
62242
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy