What is the ruling on the loss resulting from a worker's seizure of company funds—is it borne by the first partner alone, or by both, given that she is the second partner's wife and exploited the country's laws in their absence to seize the money?

The company is based on agency and trust, and there is no guarantee on the partner unless he transgresses or neglects. Accordingly, the husband does not guarantee to his partner what his wife took of the money, because they agreed to pay the money to her and entrust her with it, but she betrayed the trust and canceled the name of the other partner, and this action has no relation to her husband.