Back to search
The question

What is the ruling regarding a man's statement to his wife in a state of anger: "By what is forbidden, if he [or it] enters the house in his [or its] direction [or, towards him/it]," and what is the expiation for this oath, knowing that he believed swearing by what is forbidden meant refraining from intercourse if the matter occurred?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

As long as you did not intend divorce or ẓihār (a pre-Islamic form of divorce) by swearing by al-ḥarām (that which is forbidden), then the preponderant opinion according to us is that it requires an expiation for an oath (kaffārat yamīn) if you break it. The expiation for an oath is: feeding ten poor persons, or clothing them, or freeing a slave; and whoever cannot find [any of these] should fast for three days. It should be noted that the permissible oath is swearing by Allah, while swearing by divorce or al-ḥarām is forbidden.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
187684
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy