Back to search
The question

Does the ruling of the impurity of vomit not apply to the vomit of an animal whose meat is permissible to eat? What is the ruling on the vomit of an animal whose meat is not permissible to eat, as well as that of a dog and a pig?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Human vomit is considered pure, according to the more preponderant opinion, as long as it has not changed from food. It becomes impure if it has changed.

As for the vomit of an animal whose meat is permissible to eat, it is pure absolutely, because it is similar to its pure excretion.

The vomit of an animal whose meat is not permissible to eat is impure if it has changed from food, by analogy with its urine and droppings.

The vomit of a dog and a pig is impure, like the rest of their parts.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
56563
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy