What is the ruling on working for a company whose funds are derived from usury, knowing that the money earned is from one's own effort and is the worker's sole source of income? And is it true that SABIC's funds are usurious?

We do not have knowledge regarding the nature of the financing of the aforementioned company. We have clarified the ruling on working in a company whose financing is based on usury, and it is divided into two categories: The first is if the work necessitates writing down usury or bearing witness to it, then it is not permissible. The second is if the work is permissible and has no relation to usurious loans, then it is permissible, though refraining from it is preferable.