Back to search
The question

Is the questioner sinful for not sending money to his father who claims not to need money, while telling others the opposite?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

A son is not obligated to spend on his father if the father owns enough money to suffice him. Therefore, there is no sin upon the questioner if he does not spend on his father, provided his father is well-off. However, spending money on him brings his satisfaction and falls under righteousness towards him. The questioner should seek the reasons that prompt his father to say what has reached him, and he should strive to be dutiful to him and gain his pleasure.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
91078
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy