Back to search
The question

Is blood money obligatory upon a doctor who performed surgery on a patient in a remote area using an unproven medication in such cases, which led to the patient's death due to internal bleeding, in light of the unavailability of specialists?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Attempting to save a patient's hand from amputation is desirable, but it should not come at the expense of their life. If the medication could cause fatal bleeding, its use must be restricted to permissible cases only. If specialist doctors determine that dispensing the medication to the patient is a medical error, the doctor is responsible for the resulting harm and is liable for it even if they are not sinful. In the event that involuntary manslaughter is proven, expiation is required by fasting for two consecutive months. The blood money (Diyya) is waived if the deceased's guardians pardon, otherwise, it becomes obligatory upon the doctor's 'Aqila (paternal kin).

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
180331
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy