Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on the izar (lower garment), and is it obligatory to raise trousers above the ankles, given the permissibility of letting a garment hang below the ankles without pride?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Scholars have differed on the ruling of isbal (letting garments hang below the ankles) when it is not out of arrogance. The adopted by us is the absolute prohibition of isbal, whether it be for the izar (lower garment), trousers, or other clothing. It appears that covering the ankles is permissible, and that the prohibition and warning apply to covering what is below them. To avoid sin, it is sufficient for the length of the trousers not to extend below the ankles.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
142454
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy