Back to search
The question

Is a person considered to have broken their oath not to enter the "YouTube" website if they watch clips from it that are reposted on other sites, knowing that they do not intend to watch the pornographic or horrifying content that was the reason for their oath, and does the factor of wasting time play a role in breaking this oath?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If you swore not to enter a specific website because it contains alluring or horror films, then you are not permitted to enter it. If you do enter, you have broken your oath, and expiation is due. If these films are removed from the website, then you are permitted to enter it, and you will not have broken your oath. However, if you suspect another reason for the oath, it is not considered. You are permitted to enter other websites to watch permissible clips, even if they are from the same platform you swore about (e.g., YouTube), provided that your intention at the time of the oath did not include these permissible clips.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
101972
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy