Back to search
The question

Is expiation incumbent upon someone who swore not to memorize certain material, then proceeded to memorize it after finding summaries of it?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If your intention when swearing the oath was never to memorize the law material at all, then you have broken your oath and must offer expiation for breaking an oath. However, if your intention was not to memorize the long, difficult text, and then you found a short, easy text and memorized it, then no expiation is due from you, because the oath is based on the intention of the one who swears it. If the reason for the oath was the length and difficulty of the text, and then you found a short, easy text and memorized it, then no expiation is due from you.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
120262
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy