Back to search
The question

Does the ruling concerning someone who finds Pharaonic antiquities under his house—while he is one of the inheritors of the house—necessitate the division of their value among all heirs according to their shares, or is that not a condition?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If a "rikaz" (buried treasure) is found in privately owned land, it belongs to the landowner according to the majority of jurists, while some say it belongs to the finder. Therefore, the artifacts found in the land belong to the heirs of the land, because they are its owners, and each heir owns their legal share of it, taking into consideration the ruling on possessing or selling them if they are idols or objects with a soul.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
171674
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy