Back to search
The question

Is every obligatory act permissible and every forbidden act reprehensible, but not the reverse?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

This statement is incorrect and contrary to what has been established by the scholars. For each of the obligatory (wājib) and the permissible (mubāḥ), there is a different reality. The doer of an obligatory act is deserving of reward, and its ترك (abandoner) is deserving of sin. As for the permissible, there is no reward in doing it and no punishment in abandoning it. Likewise for the forbidden (ḥarām) and the disliked (makrūh): the doer of a forbidden act is blameworthy, and its abandoner is praiseworthy. The abandoner of a disliked act is praiseworthy, but its doer is not blameworthy.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
193279
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy