Back to search
The question

Is it considered extremism to be severe in argumentation and advice to one who errs, based on reliable fatwas? And is it considered hypocrisy to feel happy when religious posts are admired, even though the original intention was to seek reward from Allah? And is conveying fatwas while omitting some proofs or sayings of scholars, without changing the meaning, or responding to questioners with a fatwa from your website, considered audacity in issuing fatwas?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The common person emulates whomever among the people of knowledge he trusts. He is not permitted to criticize others in matters of dispute, unless he is certain that there is no valid scope for disagreement in the matter. It is not permissible to be fanatical about a particular opinion in matters of (independent reasoning). It is permissible to transmit fatwas, provided one ensures their content is not altered, and this is not an audacious act against issuing fatwas. As for hypocrisy, a Muslim must continue to perform good deeds, spread goodness, attain sincerity, resist ostentation, and not abandon good deeds due to the whispers of Satan. It seems the questioner is afflicted with whispers, and he must ignore and turn away from them.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
168974
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy