Back to search
The question

Is it permissible to adopt the view of the Hanafis and Shafi'is that pubic hair is not an absolute sign of puberty, and the view of Ibn Taymiyyah that there is no obligation to make up fasts for one who abandoned them out of ignorance of their obligation?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

It is permissible to follow the opinion of those who say that puberty is not confirmed by the growth of pubic hair. It is also permissible to follow the opinion of Ibn Taymiyyah that one who misses fasting due to ignorance is not obliged to make it up. An ordinary Muslim is permitted to follow any of the recognized madhhabs (schools of thought), provided they are not merely seeking out dispensations.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
184422
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy