Back to search
The question

What is the legal rooting for the judge's statement at the opening of a session, "In the name of His Majesty the King," or "In the name of the Republic," or "In the name of the People"?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The statement of one who says, "In the name of the President," or "In the name of the people," and so forth, if it is intended for seeking blessings and assistance, then it is (polytheism) that may reach the level of major Shirk. However, if it is intended to mean acting on behalf of the speaker in his name, then it is permissible. The Permanent Committee has issued a to this effect, as has Sheikh Al-Uthaymeen, both distinguishing between the intention of seeking blessings and assistance (which is Shirk) and the intention of expression and deputization (which is permissible).

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
25540
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy