Is a divorce effected by a man's saying to his wife, "Children from me are forbidden to you," with the intention of coitus interruptus, not intercourse, while he was in a state of anger?
The ruling on a man forbidding himself from intercourse with his wife without 'azl (coitus interruptus) is not clear, and it is more cautious to offer an expiation for an oath (kaffarat ) if he has intercourse with her in that manner. This oath is not considered an ila' (a vow to abstain from sexual intercourse); for ila' is an oath to abandon intercourse. And whoever swears, "I will not have intercourse with you until you become pregnant," intending causation and not a time limit, is not considered a mu'li (one who has made an ila' vow). It is not permissible for a man to practice 'azl with his wife except with her permission.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/168814
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 168814
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy