Back to search
The question

Is what the questioner did—fondling his wife and fulfilling his desire without intercourse, then offering an expiation for an oath two days later—correct, given that he swore by divorce not to have intercourse with her for three months, and his intention was to threaten?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If a person swears not to have intercourse with his wife for a period less than four months, and then has intercourse with her before the end of that period, he must offer expiation for a broken oath (kaffarat ) if the oath was sworn by Allah. However, if the oath was sworn by divorce (), the majority of scholars hold that the divorce occurs. Ibn Taymiyyah, on the other hand, chose the view that the divorce does not occur, and instead, expiation for a broken oath is required.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
135707
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy