Back to search
The question

Is the husband obligated to pay the fictitious mahr agreed upon before the marriage contract (which is Hajj) and which was not real, after divorcing his wife for the third time, knowing that he had already paid her the real mahr agreed upon (money)?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

We have previously clarified that a fictitious agreement intended only to appease the family and not genuinely meant is not binding. If a dispute arises and an agreement or solution cannot be reached, it is preferable to refer the matter to the court.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
118959
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy