Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on someone who, in a state of anger, swore by the inviolability of his Hajj that he would not proceed with what had been agreed upon concerning the preparations for his marriage contract, but then recanted and completed his marriage?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

A person swearing by the sacredness of his Hajj (pilgrimage) could mean two things:

First, that he forbids Hajj upon himself if he completes the preparations for the marriage contract. This does not constitute a broken oath, nor does it require expiation, because it is a change of plans. Malik and Al-Shafi'i have stated that an oath made by someone forbidding a permissible thing upon himself is not binding.

Second, that he swears by the sacredness of Hajj, saying, "By the sacredness of my Hajj, I will not complete all the marriage preparations." This oath is also not binding because it is not made by Allah Almighty. An oath is only binding when sworn by Allah Almighty or by one of His attributes.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
80508
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy