Back to search
The question

What is the ruling regarding a mahram's refusal to accompany his female relative on her journey, despite his ability to do so and her covering his expenses, and his claim that "the world is safe and a mahram is not necessary for her"?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, forbade women from traveling without a to prevent fitan (trials/temptations) and to safeguard them. This prohibition includes all journeys. The woman's guardian is responsible for her and must prevent her from traveling without a mahram, for he is a shepherd and responsible for his flock. The mahram must travel with the woman if he has no excuse and should not neglect her interests; rather, he is commanded to do so, just as the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, commanded a man to abandon Jihad and travel with his wife for Hajj. This act is a matter of murūʾah (chivalry/manliness) and embodies the meanings of a man's guardianship and qawāmah (custodianship), and there is reward and recompense in it.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
26333
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy