Back to search
The question

Why do jurists differentiate in ruling between coitus interruptus (al-azl) and contraception by modern means, even though modern means may achieve benefits that coitus interruptus does not, such as the woman's complete enjoyment?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

It is permissible to use modern birth control methods if there is a need for them, and it is a condition for the permissibility of 'azl (coitus interruptus) that the wife agrees. However, birth control should not be continuous, as it contradicts the purpose of increasing progeny. Modern birth control methods may also cause health problems, and some of them necessitate the exposure of 'awrah (private parts) or cause menstrual cycle disturbances.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
39523
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy