Back to search
The question

What is the ruling regarding past prayers and fasts if the ghusl was invalid due to ignorance of the necessity to wash certain body parts, or due to not conveying water to the roots of thick hair? And what is the correct intention if multiple causes for ghusl converge?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The cure for obsessive thoughts is to ignore them. In (ritual bath), a strong presumption of having thoroughly washed is sufficient; certainty is not required. Doubts about an act of worship after completing it are to be disregarded. If you become certain that a part of what must be washed was not reached by water, then your ghusl is invalid. Your fast is valid because purity is not a condition for the validity of fasting. It is permissible to act upon the easier opinion as long as you are afflicted with obsessive thoughts. If multiple events occur, all of which require the same type of purification, one ghusl is sufficient.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
144158
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy