Back to search
The question

Is it necessary to administer an oath to a witness in courts that apply Islamic Sharia, and what is the meaning of the agent not taking an oath or being burdened (with one)?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

According to the majority of scholars, it is not obligatory to administer an oath to a witness, although some scholars hold that it is. As for the agent, he is not required to provide evidence for the destruction of what is in his possession unless there is an accusation, because his possession is one of trust. However, if there is an accusation, he must take an oath, like other trustees.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
123599
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy