Back to search
The question

What is the evidence of Sheikh Ibn 'Uthaymeen for the rule that "everything that exits from the two private parts (or two natural orifices) invalidates ablution"?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The usual excretions from the two private parts (such as urine, feces, prostatic fluid, and wind) nullify ablution by scholarly consensus. As for rare excretions (such as worms, blood, stones, and hair), scholars have differed regarding them. The majority opinion is that they nullify ablution, while Malik held that they do not. The evidence for the majority is that these are excretions from the private parts and contain moisture, just as lochia (blood of postnatal bleeding) nullifies ablution, and it is also rare.

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
127397
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy