Back to search
The question

Are all the conditions for repentance required simultaneously for it to be accepted, such as someone who regretted, desisted, and resolved not to return [to the sin] after a short period of doubt? Is his repentance valid? And is the repentance of an apostate accepted if he regrets, desists, and resolves, and then pronounces the two testimonies, or must he repent after pronouncing them?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

It is not permissible to delay any of the pillars of repentance, because repentance is an immediate obligation, and delaying it is considered another sin that necessitates repentance. Indeed, Al-Izz ibn Abd al-Salam stated that repentance is an immediate obligation, and whoever delays it becomes disobedient by delaying it. His disobedience is repeated with the repetition of the times extended for it, which necessitates another repentance from the delay itself. If repentance is an immediate obligation, then its pillars—namely, remorse, determination not to return to the sin, and cessation from the sin—are all immediately obligatory, and repentance is not valid unless all of them are complete.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
176958
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy