Back to search
The question

What are the sayings of scholars regarding the harm considered (sufficient) for abandoning the denunciation of evil (munkar), and are cursing or reviling considered part of this harm, and is it a condition that the occurrence of harm be highly probable?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The obligation to enjoin good and forbid evil is waived when there is an expectation of significant harm to oneself, one's body, one's property, or one's honor. The harm considered is that which outweighs the harm expected from enjoining good in religious matters. As for minor harm, such as insults, backbiting, or criticism, it does not waive the obligation. It is stipulated that the expectation of harm must be based on strong presumption (al-ẓann al-ghālib) or certain knowledge (al-ʿilm al-yaqīnī), and mere doubt or possibility is not sufficient.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
159578
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy