Back to search
The question

Is it not more appropriate to use "lā an-nāfiyah" (the negating "lā") instead of "lam an-nāfiyah" (the negating "lam") in Surat al-Ikhlas, to convey absolute negation in His (the Most High) saying: "He begets not, nor is He begotten, and there is none co-equal or comparable to Him"?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The negation using "لم" (lam) in Al- is employed to refute the belief of the polytheists regarding Allah having a father or a son in the past, which they claimed. The verses are a refutation of their statement. "And there is none comparable to Him" came to affirm the preceding negation, indicating that there is no equal or similar to Allah in His attributes and actions, and in everything else, because they alleged that this occurred in a bygone time.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
165060
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy