Back to search
The question

Is swearing "by the Prophet" considered a vain oath for which there is no expiation, given its common usage, or is it impermissible to say it at all because it is polytheism, even if the tongue has become accustomed to it?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Swearing by other than Allah, including swearing by the Prophet or the Kaaba, is not permissible according to the preponderant opinion; in fact, it has been said to be polytheism (). It is not considered a binding oath that requires expiation (kaffara) when violated, even though some scholars differed and held that expiation is obligatory. This type of oath is unrelated to the false oath ( al-ghamūs) or the idle oath (yamin al-laghw). Whoever is afflicted with it must abandon it and guard their tongue. Jurists disliked or prohibited swearing by other than Allah. If one swears by other than Him, their oath is not binding. While there is a difference of opinion regarding the ruling on swearing by other than Him if one is truthful, if one is lying, it is definitively forbidden, in order to preserve the sanctity of revered religious symbols.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
131271
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy