Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on someone who obligated themselves to fast three consecutive months and recite one part (juz') of the Qur’an daily as a punishment for an act that is not forbidden, then became unable to fulfill this obligation; and is expiation for an oath (kaffarat al-yameen) sufficient for them instead of fasting, and what is the value of this expiation in Egyptian Pounds?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Whoever swears an oath not to do a certain thing by one of the names of Allah Almighty or one of His attributes, and then does what he swore to abandon, must offer an expiation for breaking an oath (kaffarat ). However, if he does not do what he swore to abandon, then there is no expiation upon him. But if he does what he swore to do, and fasts for three consecutive months, and recites one part (juz') of the Qur’an daily, then there is no expiation upon him. It is permissible to interrupt obligatory fasting, such as during , or fasting that is prohibited, such as during menstruation or Eid, while maintaining the consecutive nature [of the expiatory fast].

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
147099
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy