Which book is better for studying comparative Fiqh: "Al-Fiqh Al-Islami wa Adillatuh" or "Tawdih Al-Ahkam min Bulugh Al-Maram"?

Both "Islamic Fiqh and its Proofs" and "Clarification of Rulings" have their own advantages. The first is distinguished by its comprehensiveness and numerous branches, while the second is notable for being a modern book, having its rulings substantiated with proofs, and being concise, making it suitable for beginners. There are other books considered works of comparative fiqh, such as: "Al-Mughni" by Ibn Qudamah, "Al-Majmu'" by Al-Nawawi, "Bada'i' al-Sana'i'" by Al-Kasani, "Al-Istidhkar" and "Al-Tamhid" by Ibn Abd al-Barr, "Al-Sayl al-Jarrar" by Al-Shawkani, "Al-Durar al-Mudi'ah," "Daw' al-Nahar" by Al-Jalal, "Hashiyat Ibn al-Amir al-San'ani," "Al-Bayan" by Al-Imrani, "Al-Hawi" by Al-Mawardi, "Fiqh al-Sunnah" by Sayyid Sabiq, and "Bidayat al-Mujtahid" by Ibn Rushd.