Which book is better for studying comparative Fiqh: "Al-Fiqh Al-Islami wa Adillatuh" or "Tawdih Al-Ahkam min Bulugh Al-Maram"?
Both "Islamic Fiqh and its Proofs" and "Clarification of Rulings" have their own advantages. The first is distinguished by its comprehensiveness and numerous branches, while the second is notable for being a modern book, having its rulings substantiated with proofs, and being concise, making it suitable for beginners. There are other books considered works of comparative fiqh, such as: "Al-Mughni" by Ibn Qudamah, "Al-Majmu'" by Al-Nawawi, "Bada'i' al-Sana'i'" by Al-Kasani, "Al-Istidhkar" and "Al-Tamhid" by Ibn Abd al-Barr, "Al-Sayl al-Jarrar" by Al-Shawkani, "Al-Durar al-Mudi'ah," "Daw' al-Nahar" by Al-Jalal, "Hashiyat Ibn al-Amir al-San'ani," "Al-Bayan" by Al-Imrani, "Al-Hawi" by Al-Mawardi, "Fiqh al-" by Sayyid Sabiq, and "Bidayat al-Mujtahid" by Ibn Rushd.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/89999
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 89999
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy