How can one respond to the atheist's argument that the existence of something from nothing is possible, based on probabilities of "1 over infinity," while adhering to the law of causality, especially in the face of the idea that "a monkey can write like Shakespeare" or the emergence of the "Big Bang" in this manner?

The atheism of the person responsible for it stems from arrogance and obstinacy, for belief in the existence of God is an innate matter. Some are driven to atheism by their unwillingness to adhere to divine law, and they attribute the cosmic order to chance. The claim that the universe came into existence by chance is a superficial and naive explanation, because it contradicts logic and reason, and is mathematically impossible. Even if the Big Bang theory were proven, it does not negate the existence of a Creator who directs its affairs. It is advisable to seek beneficial knowledge and not to debate atheists without firm knowledge to avoid doubt and whisperings.