Is it better for the layman to follow the most preponderant and cautious opinion from the interpretations of the four imams and others, instead of adhering to a specific madhhab? And is it advisable to recommend this to people and to those who follow a specific madhhab? And what are the justifications that excuse a layman if he does not follow the preponderant opinion?

The preponderant view in disputed secondary matters is relative, and it is obligatory for the layperson to follow someone whose knowledge and piety they trust. This absolves them of responsibility, and they are not required to seek out the most stringent opinions. Adhering to one of the recognized schools of thought is permissible under its conditions, and it is permissible for the layperson to switch from one school to another as long as they do not intend to seek out dispensations. It is also permissible for them to avail themselves of the easiest opinions when there is a need.