Back to search
The question

Is the fluid that was discharged with lust considered semen that necessitates performing ghusl, given that it did not meet all the characteristics of semen (thin, yellowish, and odor of pollen), but the characteristics of lust and subsequent relaxation were present? Is it permissible to suffice with this characteristic to rule that it is semen? Can the intention for ghusl from menstruation be combined with the intention for ghusl from semen? Or is it madhy, which does not necessitate ghusl?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The pleasure experienced upon the emission of semen and the subsequent cooling of desire are sufficient indicators to determine it is semen, and the confluence of all three signs of semen is not a prerequisite. A woman can combine the intention for (ritual bath) for menstruation with that for (major ritual impurity).

Summarized from the full answer at Ftawy · imported

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
156364
Imported
Translation status
Source text, unreviewed
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy