Back to search
The question

What is the criterion followed by some scholars in elaborating on the issue of one who abandons prayer, such as those who said that it is either due to denial or negligence, given that there is no explicit hadith or narration from the Companions with this elaboration? And is it more appropriate to adhere to the explicit, authenticated text from the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, or to the elaborations of scholars who came after him?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The issue of ruling that one who abandons prayer out of laziness is guilty of major disbelief (kufr akbar) that expels him from the fold of Islam is a matter of (independent reasoning) for which there is no explicit text. The majority do not consider his disbelief to be major disbelief, and they interpret the disbelief mentioned in the hadiths about abandoning prayer, or similar hadiths such as: "Abusing a Muslim is a Fusuq (disobedience), and fighting him is Kufr (disbelief)," to mean a minor disbelief (kufr duna kufr).

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
185636
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy