Back to search
The question

Is the disagreement among Hadith scholars limited to discrediting or accrediting a narrator, or does it also include the continuity of the narration and the narrator's tadlis (deception), such that they do not differ on the discontinuity of a single Hadith?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

scholars differ regarding the continuity of narration. Those who affirm that a narrator heard directly from his shaykh consider the hadith to be continuous, while those who do not affirm this consider it to be disconnected. This leads to the rejection or acceptance of the hadith, consequently resulting in differences among jurists. Scholars also differ concerning tadlis (concealment), and their views vary on the extent to which reports from mudallisun (narrators who practice concealment) are accepted, depending on their ranks and methodologies.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
146380
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy