Back to search
The question

Is it permissible to describe things as "immortal" or "everlasting" (khalid) – such as "this is an immortal book," "his morals are everlasting," "his story is everlasting," "his stances are everlasting," "his biography is everlasting" – without intending to describe persons with this attribute?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

There is no legal impediment to describing something as eternal, as the origin of eternity is permanence and steadfastness. Ibn Faris, in "Maqayis al-Lughah," explained that the letters kha, lam, and dal signify steadfastness and adherence, and he mentioned examples such as "Jannat al-Khuld" (the Garden of Eternity) and "akhlad ila al-ard" (inclined to the earth). The Prophet (peace be upon him) approved the name "Khalid" and did not change it. The description does not imply imperishability but rather a long duration and permanence until a certain time.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
195753
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy