Back to search
The question

Is expiation obligatory for each time a friend was not informed of the sin, or is it sufficient to inform him of all the times the sin was committed to fulfill the oath?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The answer is summarized as follows: The legitimate means of restraining oneself from sin is to strive against it, to be mindful of Allah, and to recall the ominous consequences of sins. Ibn al-Qayyim said: "No blessing is removed from a servant except due to a sin, and no misfortune befalls him except due to a sin."

Frequent swearing is reprehensible in Islamic law. A Muslim is commanded to conceal his own faults, and it is disliked for him to disclose his sins.

If an oath is taken to perform something disliked, it is recommended to break the oath, and it is disliked to fulfill it.

As for the phrase "كلما" (every time/whenever), it does not imply immediacy unless intended or indicated by a context. So, if you did not intend immediacy in your oath, then delaying informing your friend about what you did is not considered a breach of the oath. Informing him about the times you committed the sin is considered fulfilling the oath, and no expiation is required of you. However, if you intended immediacy, then delaying informing him is considered a breach. If you broke your oath and did not offer expiation for it until you broke another oath, then only one expiation is required of you.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
190039
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy