Is it possible to cite the story of the drowning of Noah's son (peace be upon him) to confront those who prioritize intellect over scripture?

It is permissible to allude to the story of the drowning of Noah's son, as an anecdote and a source of comfort, indicating the precedence of definitive divine text over speculative reason. Noah's son thought that the mountain would protect him, while he neglected the revelation that there is no protector from Allah's command except for those upon whom He bestows mercy. The result was drowning. The gist of the matter is that this inference is not from the core of knowledge but rather from the realm of interpretive anecdotes and allusions found in verses. Religion is based on sound transmission supported by clear reason, and what the prophets convey does not contradict reason; rather, minds may be bewildered by it and unable to grasp it due to their limitations.