Back to search
The question

To what extent is Fatwa No. 5224, which stipulates the obligation for women to cover their face and hands in front of foreign men, valid, and does this fatwa accord with what Sheikh Al-Albani and some imams of the four madhhabs have concluded, that the face and hands of a woman are not considered 'awrah?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

We previously mentioned the rulings of the jurists from the four madhhabs regarding the ruling on covering the face, and the relied-upon opinion in the Shafi'i is the obligation of covering. As for Imam Ahmad, his companions narrated from him statements indicating the obligation of covering, such as his saying: "Her fingernail attached to her is 'awrah, so if she goes out, nothing of her should be visible; nor should her khuff (leather sock) be thin, for it describes the foot. And I prefer that she put a button on her sleeve near her hands."

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
61722
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy