Is the statement by the questioner that he swore an oath of triple divorce considered a false acknowledgment of divorce having occurred, or a metaphorical expression, given that three metaphorical comments were made by him without the intention of divorce, and his purpose in saying what he did was to mislead the listeners into believing that what happened had occurred with someone else?

The wording of a kinayah (allusive or indirect divorce) depends on the intention of the husband. The divorce mentioned in the three cases did not occur. If the husband falsely claims to have divorced, the divorce does not take effect, according to the preponderant opinion. It is advisable to avoid thoughts and ideas related to divorce so that they do not turn into obsessive whispering (waswasah).