Back to search
The question

Does the legal ruling differ between the serious and the joking person regarding describing an original disbeliever as an "innovator"? And does the rule "Whoever does not declare a disbeliever to be a disbeliever is himself a disbeliever" apply to him?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Most likely, the statements mentioned fall under the category of prohibited jesting. It does not appear that the speaker intends to lift the ruling of disbelief (kufr) from an original disbeliever. Therefore, the rule "whoever does not declare a disbeliever to be a disbeliever is himself a disbeliever" does not apply to him, because if he were asked about the religious ruling concerning an original disbeliever, he would answer that it is disbelief.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
154060
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy