Back to search
The question

What is the ruling regarding a man's statement to his wife in a fit of extreme anger, "If you speak to so-and-so, you are divorced," if he does not intend divorce but rather to prevent her from speaking, and the wife has not spoken to her yet?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

The majority of scholars hold that a conditional divorce takes effect upon the fulfillment of the condition, and this is the preponderant view. Consequently, if the condition upon which you suspended the divorce has been met, then according to the majority, the divorce has occurred.

However, Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah was of the opinion that an expiation for an oath (kaffarat yameen) is required if you did not intend divorce.

According to the view that the divorce takes effect, which is the preponderant one, you may take her back before her waiting period () ends, provided this divorce does not complete the three divorces. There is no possibility of retracting this conditional divorce according to the majority, nor is there any retraction from the oath according to the of Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
117312
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy