Back to search
The question

Is occasionally not wearing gloves—while a niqabi is in a country where custom obliges wearing them—considered hypocrisy, and are they necessary for a niqabi?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

Scholars differed on the ruling regarding covering the hands. The view of Ahmad and the sound opinion within the Shafi'i school is that covering them is obligatory, while the view of Malik and Abu Hanifa is that covering them is recommendable. The preponderant view is the obligation of covering. Covering the hands with gloves or with the sleeves of the jilbab is sufficient. It is obligatory to cover the face and the hands, whether or not they are eye-catching. According to the view that covering is obligatory, a woman uncovering her hands is a sin because she has abandoned an obligation, but it is not hypocrisy.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
69701
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy