What is the meaning of Ibn Taymiyyah's statement: "The appellation of shirk (polytheism) is established prior to the رسالة (prophetic message), because he associates partners with his Lord and makes equals to Him"?
Ibn Taymiyyah clarifies that (polytheism) is ugly and blameworthy in all circumstances, both before and after the advent of prophethood, and that it is an inherent characteristic of shirk itself. However, the punishment for shirk is conditioned upon the establishment of proof (ḥujjah) and the coming of a messenger. Thus, a polytheist does not deserve punishment until after clarification (bayān). By this, he refutes the Muʿtazilah and the Ashʿariyyah, asserting that the methodology of Ahl al- is a middle way: actions are inherently ugly both before and after prophethood, but there is no punishment until after the establishment of proof.
Summary from Ftawy's records · added here
Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full answer on Ftawyhttps://ftawy.com/en/questions/2207
Where this answer came from
- Source platform
- Ftawy
- Original fatwa ID
- 2207
- Added here
- . This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
- Text
- Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
- Read the full ruling
- Read the full answer on Ftawy