Is telling someone that 300 Dirhams have been paid – when they haven't been paid in full – considered a lie, knowing that the intention was based on an agreement? And is intervening in a financial dispute between two parties, and stipulating the memorization of the Holy Quran in exchange for forgiving a debt, considered a tribulation and a trial, especially since one of the parties is a mosque Imam and is related to the family?

The greatest temptation for men is women, and what the questioner mentioned about this young man knowing her and her family is not proof of innocence from temptation; rather, it is one of Satan's stratagems. Regarding the subject of the question, what was mentioned about the brother's friend giving him 300 dirhams if he succeeds in the exam is a promise. The majority of scholars have held that fulfilling a promise is recommended but not obligatory, while some scholars have maintained that fulfilling it is absolutely obligatory. Some scholars have offered a detailed view, which is closer to correctness: if the promisee entered into something because of the promise, and would suffer harm if it were retracted, then fulfilling it becomes obligatory; otherwise, it is not obligatory, but remains recommended.