Back to search
The question

What is the ruling on someone who ate, thinking that the Fajr adhan had not yet been called, then stopped eating upon hearing the adhan, whether it was for an obligatory fast like Ramadan, a compensatory fast, an oath, or other types of obligatory fasts, or for a supererogatory fast?

Share this answer

Source: FtawySummary from Ftawy's records · added here Sep 2, 20261 min readAlso available in العربية
The answer

If someone ate, thinking that Fajr had not yet dawned, while observing an obligatory fast like , and it later became clear that they ate after Fajr had dawned, then they are required to abstain [from eating and drinking for the rest of the day] and make up that fast, according to the majority of scholars. However, if their fast was a supererogatory one, then they are not required to abstain nor to make up the fast. Some jurists, such as Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen, hold the view that an obligatory fast does not need to be made up, although abstention for the rest of the day is still required. Nevertheless, the first opinion is more cautious and more absolving of responsibility.

Summary from Ftawy's records · added here

Reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.

Read the full answer on Ftawy
Where this answer came from
Source platform
Ftawy
Original fatwa ID
162998
Added here
. This is when the answer was added to El Fatwa, not the fatwa's date.
Text
Summary from Ftawy's records, reviewed by El Fatwa's sharia committee.
Read the full ruling
Read the full answer on Ftawy